CEL-SCI Corporation Announces Phase 3 Multikine® Head and Neck Cancer Results Posted on Clinicaltrials.gov
CEL-SCI Corporation Announces Phase 3 Multikine® Head and Neck Cancer Results Posted on Clinicaltrials.gov
The “Proposed Indication” for Multikine that will be submitted to the FDA in a license application will be limited by certain eligibility criteria to patients who would be deemed by NCCN Guidelines as having a lower risk for tumor recurrence. The Standard of Care for lower risk for tumor recurrence advanced primary head and neck cancer patients is surgery followed by radiotherapy, but not chemotherapy. Note that the term “lower risk for recurrence” should not be confused with a low risk of death, because the 5-year survival for such patients is still less than 50%, even after receiving the current standard of care (SOC). The Proposed Indication for Multikine would cover an estimated 210,000 patients globally each year.
Data collected during the Phase 3 trial that will be submitted to FDA in support of the Proposed Indication are:
Partial and complete tumor responses within 3 weeks and before surgery (objective responses per RECIST):
- 8.1% (32/395) objective response rate (ORR) for Multikine+CIZ patients in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population versus zero in the SOC group (n=394).
- 15.2% (24/158) ORR for Multikine+CIZ patients in the lower-risk-for-recurrence arm versus zero in the SOC group (n=168).
- Two-sided Fisher Exact p-values <0.0000001 for ORR.
- Complete responses before surgery were seen in 5 Multikine+CIZ patients.
Objective response before surgery was prognostic/predictive of improved overall survival (OS) and significant for reduced death rate:
- In the ITT population, 22.2% death rate versus 54.1% death rate (Multikine objective responders versus Multikine non-responders; two-sided Fisher Exact p-value <0.0001; HR=0.301 [95% CI 0.16, 0.566]).
- In the lower-risk-for-recurrence arm, 12.5% death rate versus 41.0% death rate (Multikine+CIZ objective responders versus Multikine+CIZ non-responders; two-sided Fisher Exact p-value=0.0101; HR=0.246 [95% CI 0.077, 0.787]).
Data that will be provided to FDA to confirm efficacy in the Proposed Indication:
- Analysis of the lower-risk-for-recurrence arm was pre-specified in the original study protocol and in the statistical analysis plan. This arm comprised about 40% of all study participants.
- 14.1% absolute OS advantage at 5-years in the lower-risk-for-recurrence arm (62.7% vs 48.6%) for Multikine+CIZ patients versus SOC patients. OS benefit was also shown at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years.
- Nearly 4-year increase in median overall survival in the lower-risk-for-recurrence arm (101.7 months for Multikine+CIZ versus 55.2 months for the SOC).
- Histopathological analysis confirmed the effect of Multikine, as 61 markers, ratios, and combinations showed a statistically significant effect in the lower-risk-for-recurrence arm (two-sided p<0.05) favoring Multikine+CIZ versus the SOC for OS, progression free survival, and loco-regional control outcomes.
- Additional (confirmatory) progression-free survival benefit in the lower-risk-for-recurrence arm was observed for Multikine+CIZ versus the SOC.
- No excess safety issues: The overall incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events in the Multikine arms was not substantially different versus the SOC.
The pivotal Phase 3 trial is intended to support a Biologics Licensing Application to FDA, which has not yet been submitted. FDA is the only U.S. entity authorized to determine safety and efficacy. Multikine is currently not FDA approved.
VIENNA, Va.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–$CVM #Multikine–CEL-SCI Corporation (NYSE American: CVM) announced today that the results of its 10-year IT-MATTERS pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial in head and neck cancer with its investigational immunotherapy Multikine®* (Leukocyte Interleukin, Injection) have been posted on clinicaltrials.gov per U.S. government requirements. (See https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT01265849?term=multikine&draw=2&rank=2). Clinicaltrials.gov is the largest clinical trial database in the world. It is run by the U.S. National Library of Medicine at the National Institutes of Health. Some of the trial’s results were published in two peer-reviewed abstracts and a poster at the ASCO conference in June 2022. (See https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220527005092/en/.) Additional results will be published in scientific journals and presented in scientific forums in the future.
Design of IT-MATTERS Phase 3 Trial
The 928-patient IT-MATTERS study was designed to determine if Multikine provided survival and other clinical benefits to patients suffering from locally advanced primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), oral cavity and soft-palate. Multikine is a mixture of naturally occurring cytokines that regulate the immune system. Multikine is the first investigational cancer immunotherapy being developed as a first-line neo-adjuvant treatment to be provided to previously untreated locally advanced primary disease SCCHN patients before they receive the SOC. The global IT-MATTERS trial was conducted in 23 countries in accordance with Good Clinical Practices, International Counsel for Harmonization standards, and all other country-specific regulatory requirements.
Following diagnosis, subjects were randomized into one of three treatment arms. In the primary treatment arm (3/7) subjects received three consecutive weeks of treatment with supraphysiologic doses of Multikine injected 5x/wk peritumorally and perilymphatically plus “CIZ” prior to receiving the SOC. (CIZ comprised a non-chemotherapeutic dose of cyclophosphamide (administered one-time only IV-bolus, 3 days prior to the 1st dose of Multikine), and indomethacin and zinc-multivitamins daily from day 1 of Multikine administration to one day before surgery to enhance Multikine activity.) In the second arm (1/7), subjects received the three-week Multikine regimen without CIZ prior to receiving the SOC. In the third arm (3/7), which was study control arm, subjects received only the SOC (with no Multikine or CIZ). Thus, all subjects in the study received the SOC, but some subjects received Multikine before the SOC (the two study treatment arms) and some did not (study control arm). The two main comparator groups in the study were the primary arm (Multikine+CIZ+SOC) and the study control arm (SOC alone).
The SOC for all research subjects was identical and involved a bifurcated treatment path following surgery, i.e., a radiotherapy-only arm and a concurrent chemoradiotherapy arm. To determine which path a patient should take, the treating physicians decided after surgery based on pathology and medical judgment, as guided by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines, whether the patient was at a higher risk for tumor recurrence. These patients would receive concurrent chemoradiotherapy. All other patients were classified as lower risk for recurrence and would receive only radiotherapy after surgery.
The “Proposed Indication” for Multikine will be limited by certain eligibility criteria to select patients deemed by NCCN Guidelines for the lower-risk-for-recurrence group. Patients would not meet the eligibility criteria if they present with adverse features that would place them in the higher-risk-for-recurrence group per NCCN Guidelines. Note that the term “lower risk for recurrence” should not be confused with a low risk of death, because the 5-year survival for such patients is still less than 50%, even after receiving the current SOC.
It must also be noted that the bifurcated treatment path described above was not created by CEL-SCI for its study but was, and still is, the SOC per NCCN Guidelines for advanced primary SCCHN patients. Because it would have been unethical to deprive any subjects of the SOC, the only ethical way to have conducted the study was to use the bifurcated SOC following surgery—it would not have been ethically permissible to study Multikine in only one treatment arm at a time (lower-risk or higher-risk only). Furthermore, because it was obvious when the study was designed that Multikine might provide a benefit in only one of the two SOC risk groups, CEL-SCI pre-specified in its original study protocol that analyses of the trial results should take place for all, as well as for each of these groups. Separate analyses of the lower-risk-for-recurrence and higher-risk-for-recurrence treatment arms were also pre-specified in the study’s statistical analysis plan which was completed before data lock and the study result were analyzed.
About 40% of study subjects (n=380) were classified and met the NCCN requirements for having a lower risk of tumor recurrence, and it was in this arm of the study that the vast majority of the objective responders discussed above were observed. It was also observed in this arm that Multikine+CIZ-treated non-responders still saw OS benefit. Thus, when the lower-risk-for-recurrence arm was viewed as a whole (responders plus non-responders together), a statistically significant OS benefit from Multikine was observed overall, which provided a nearly four-year extension of median survival time versus the control.
Using data from the study, CEL-SCI developed eligibility criteria to select, prior to surgery, the patients who would be slated for classification by the NCCN Guidelines as lower-risk-for-recurrence. This distinction currently can be determined only after surgery. Based on the ability to select subjects before surgery who should receive the Multikine treatment, CEL-SCI plans to seek FDA approval for the treatment of locally advanced primary disease SCCHN subjects who would receive Multikine first, then receive surgery, and then receive only radiotherapy, per NCCN Guidelines.
The Proposed Indication represents about 210,000 patients worldwide per year. To CEL-SCI’s knowledge the last medical advance for such patients impacting their overall survival occurred when Methotrexate was approved over 60 years ago. Multikine also received FDA Orphan Drug Designation for the “neoadjuvant therapy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).” There is thus a clear unmet medical need for improved treatments for these patients.
IT-MATTERS Phase 3 Trial Results Summary
This release summarizes the results recently posted on clinicaltrials.gov for the overall ITT population as well as the subjects constituting the Proposed Indication representing 41.2% of the study overall ITT population. (See https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT01265849?term=multikine&draw=2&rank=2) Please refer to the clinicaltrials.gov presentation of the data for further information on study design and study data.
Objective Responses Before Surgery (partial and complete tumor response per RECIST, confirmed at surgery by pathology): In the overall ITT population, objective responses before surgery (sometimes also called “early responses”) were observed in 45 subjects who received Multikine for 3 weeks; no such responses were observed in the SOC alone (control) (p<0.00000001).
- Five subjects who received Multikine+CIZ had complete tumor responses confirmed at surgery.
In the overall ITT population (n=923), objective responses were seen in:
- 8.5% of Multikine-treated subjects (45/529).
- 8.1% of the Multikine+CIZ treatment arm (32/395).
- 9.7% of the Multikine without CIZ treatment arm (13/134);
- 0% of the SOC alone (control) treatment arm (0/394).
In the Proposed Indication (n=380), objective responses were seen in:
- 16.0% of Multikine-treated subjects (34/212).
- 15.2% of the Multikine+CIZ treatment arm (24/158).
- 18.5% of the Multikine without CIZ treatment arm (10/54); and
- 0% of the SOC alone (control) treatment arm (0/168).
Objective Responses Before Surgery Were Prognostic For Survival with a Significant Decrease in Death Rate:
- In the overall ITT population (n=923), the 22.2% death rate among Multikine objective responders before surgery (n=45) was significantly lower (two-sided Fisher Exact test p<0.0001; HR=0.301) than the 54.1% death rate for the remaining Multikine non-responders (n=484);
In the Proposed Indication (n=380):
- the 17.6% death rate among all Multikine objective responders before surgery (n=34) was significantly lower (two-sided Fisher Exact test p=0.0067; HR=0.348) than the 42.7% death rate for the remaining Multikine non-responders (n=178).
- the 12.5% death rate among Multikine+CIZ objective responders before surgery (n=24) was significantly lower (two-sided Fisher Exact test p=0.0101; HR=0.246) than the 41.0% death rate for the remaining Multikine non-responders (n=134).
Significant OS advantage in the Proposed Indication for the Multikine+CIZ treatment arm versus the SOC control:
- 5-year absolute OS advantage of 14.1% (62.7% vs 48.6%);
- proportional hazards two-sided p=0.0236;
- 0.68 hazard ratio equating to a 47% OS prolongation; and
- 3-year and 4-year absolute OS advantage of 4.9% and 9.5%, respectively, are supportive.
- In the overall ITT population, no statistically significant OS difference was seen between the two main comparator groups (proportional hazards two-sided p=0.4128). It is believed that the higher-risk-for-recurrence patients in the overall ITT were too sick to tolerate the extra three-weeks before surgery for the Multikine treatment and also that chemotherapy may impair Multikine’s immunological mechanism of action.
- Nearly Four-Year Median OS Benefit: In the Proposed Indication, the median OS for those receiving Multikine+CIZ was 101.7 months versus 55.2 months for the control, a survival improvement of almost four years. The Multikine treatment arm without CIZ in the Proposed Indication also had better median OS than control (68.2 months vs. 55.2 months).
- Progression-Free Survival (PFS): In the Proposed Indication, there was confirmatory PFS difference between the two main comparator groups (HR=0.76; proportional hazards two-sided p=0.0896). In the overall ITT population, there was no statistically significant PFS difference between the two main comparator groups (proportional hazards two-sided p=0.3728).
- Locoregional Control (LRC): In the Proposed Indication, there was no statistically significant LRC difference between the two main study groups (proportional hazards two-sided p=0.4082). In the overall ITT population, there was no statistically significant LRC difference between the two main comparator groups (proportional hazards two-sided p=0.8020).
Significant Histopathological Results: OS, PFS, and LRC were examined using a proportional hazards model to assess the interactions between histopathology (HP) cellular marker expression levels, risk group (lower and higher), and treatment in the two main comparator groups. Twenty HP markers were classified as low, medium, and high. Two HP ratios were classified as low, medium, and high. Fourteen HP combinations were classified as low and high. These resulted in 94 possible comparisons for each of OS, PFS, and LRC. Significance favoring Multikine+CIZ vs. control (two-sided p<0.05) was observed in the Proposed Indication as follows:
- OS: 14 markers, 2 ratios, and 9 combinations;
- PFS: 11 markers, 1 ratio, and 5 combinations;
- LRC: 9 markers, 1 ratio, and 6 combinations;
- Combined (summed across endpoints), significance was reached for 21.6% (61/282) of the total possible comparisons, and the one-sided 97.5% confidence bound on the fraction significance was 16.3% which exceeds 5% chance alone.
No excess safety issues:
- The overall adverse event rates were 92.4% for the Multikine+CIZ treatment arm; 95.9% for the treatment arm receiving Multikine without CIZ, and 96.1% for the SOC alone (control) treatment arm.
- The overall serious adverse event rates were 53% for the Multikine+CIZ treatment arm, 50.7% for the treatment arm receiving Multikine without CIZ, and 52.7% for the SOC alone (control) treatment arm.
- The incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events noted in the Multikine arms was not substantially different from those in control.
Importance of Multikine’s IT-MATTERS Trial Results
Head and neck carcinomas constitute about 890,000 cases annually worldwide. In the United States, there are about 68,000 new cases annually. Of those, 90% are squamous cell carcinomas, and approximately two-thirds of these patients present on their first visit with locally advanced primary (untreated) disease. Currently, the median 3-year OS with the existing SOC is estimated at 55%. The 5-year OS is approximately 43%. There are clearly many locally advanced primary SCCHN patients who are not well served by the currently available treatment modalities.
The IT-MATTERS trial confirms that a 3-week treatment with Multikine provides objective responses before surgery with statistically significant five-year OS benefit for the Proposed Indication, i.e., patients deemed by the NCCN Guidelines as lower risk of recurrence and who should receive radiotherapy without chemotherapy following surgery.
Multikine administration (+/- CIZ), as the first therapy after diagnosis, demonstrated objective complete and partial responses before surgery in 8.5% of the overall ITT population and in 16.0% of all Multikine-treated patients (+/- CIZ) in the lower-risk-for-recurrence treatment arm. A partial response means that the tumor has been reduced by at least 30%, and a complete response means that the tumor has completely disappeared. These objective tumor responses were noted within three-weeks of the beginning of Multikine treatment up to surgery and provided direct evidence of Multikine’s anticancer activity.
Although objective responses to cancer drugs do not always lead to improved survival, in the case of Multikine, objective responses resulted in a significantly reduced death rate. For Multikine+CIZ patients in the Proposed Indication, the death rate fell from 41% for non-responders to 12.5% for objective responders. A similar effect was also seen for objective responders in the overall ITT as well.
These reduced death rates yielded an absolute OS advantage of 14.1% at 5-years versus the SOC alone in the lower-risk-for-recurrence treatment arm, with a proportional hazard p-value of 0.0236, a hazard ratio of 0.68 (representing 47% prolongation of survival), a median overall survival that is nearly 4-years longer than from the SOC alone, confirmatory PFS benefit, and histopathological data showing the direct effect of the Multikine treatment on the tumor and the tumor microenvironment.
These statistics mean that for every 100 patients who would receive Multikine (if approved) followed by surgery and radiotherapy only, the likelihood is that about 14 more people would be alive at 5-years compared to the existing SOC. Since about 210,000 advanced primary SCCHN patients globally would be eligible for this treatment, the OS advantage seen in this study could mean that about 29,000 more people would be alive at 5-years post-therapy versus the SOC if all these patients received the Multikine+CIZ treatment regimen followed by surgery and radiotherapy.
By contrast, the SOC control group did not see any objective responses before surgery. CEL-SCI is unaware of any existing therapy that provides complete or partial tumor responses within three-weeks of treatment before surgery for locally advanced primary SCCHN, much less objective responses before surgery that are prognostic/predictive of longer survival, as reached in this study.
It must be noted that Multikine is different from existing therapies. Multikine is designed to be administered locally first, immediately following diagnosis, to previously untreated patients whose tumors and any involved lymph nodes are slated for surgical resection with “intent-to-cure” SOC. To the company’s knowledge, there has been no such therapy or neoadjuvant approved by FDA in at least several decades for resectable locally advanced primary SCCHN. Although existing checkpoint inhibitor drug therapies (like Keytruda) have been approved and marketed as “first-line” treatments for head and neck cancer, their indications are limited to the first-line treatment of recurrent or non-resectable tumors. By contrast, Multikine’s Proposed Indication would be for previously untreated, locally advanced primary SCCHN patients scheduled for surgery and radiation without chemotherapy, encompassing about 40% of the entire advanced primary SCCHN population.
These Phase 3 trial results are intended to support a Biologics Licensing Application to FDA, which has not yet been submitted. FDA is the only U.S. entity authorized to determine safety and efficacy, and Multikine is currently not approved.
About CEL-SCI Corporation
CEL-SCI believes that boosting a patient’s immune system while it is still intact should provide the greatest possible impact on survival. Therefore, in the Phase 3 study, CEL-SCI treated subjects who were newly diagnosed with advanced primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with the investigational product Multikine first, before they received surgery and radiotherapy, or surgery plus concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy (the current standard of care for these patients). This approach is unique. Most other cancer immunotherapies are administered only after conventional therapies have been tried and/or failed. Multikine (Leukocyte Interleukin, Injection) received Orphan Drug designation from the FDA for neoadjuvant therapy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (cancer) of the head and neck. CEL-SCI believes that this study is the largest Phase 3 study in the world for the treatment of advanced primary head and neck cancer.
Multikine is designed to help the immune system “see” the tumor at a time when the immune system is still relatively intact and, thereby, thought to be better able to mount an attack on the tumor. The Phase 3 study was started in early 2011 and was fully enrolled with 928 subjects in September 2016. To prove an overall survival benefit, the study required CEL-SCI to wait until at least 298 (deaths) events had occurred among the two main comparator groups.
The Company has operations in Vienna, Virginia, and in Baltimore, Maryland.
This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. When used in this press release, the words “intends,” “believes,” “anticipated,” “plans” and “expects,” and similar expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Such statements include, but are not limited to, statements about the terms, expected proceeds, use of proceeds and closing of the offering. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include an inability to duplicate the clinical results demonstrated in clinical studies, timely development of any potential products that can be shown to be safe and effective, receiving necessary regulatory approvals, difficulties in manufacturing any of the Company’s potential products, inability to raise the necessary capital and the risk factors set forth from time to time in CEL-SCI’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including but not limited to its report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2021.
Gavin de Windt